Without Consent

Date July 1, 2008

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Daniel Engber’s new article in Slate offers offers plenty of fresh muckraking about the horse racing industry. His piece concludes with a classic animal rights argument: the immorality of inflicting danger or suffering on beings unable to provide consent. It’s a powerful argument against meat eating, against vivisection, and, now, against doping thoroughbreds. Link.

Spread the word:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • TwitThis

Category Posted in Blog

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.